Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 21: e227903, jan.-dez. 2022. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1355005

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy and the validity of orthodontic diagnostic measurements, as well as virtual tooth transformations using a generic open access 3D software compared to OrthoAnalyzer (3Shape) software; which was previously tested and proven for accuracy. Methods: 40 maxillary and mandibular single arch study models were duplicated and scanned using 3Shape laser scanner. The files were imported into the generic and OrthoAnalyzer software programs; where linear measurements were taken twice to investigate the accuracy of the program. To test the accuracy of the program format, they were printed, rescanned and imported into OrthAnalyzer. Finally, to investigate the accuracy of editing capabilities, linear and angular transformation procedures were performed, superimposed and printed to be rescanned and imported to OrthoAnalyzer for comparison. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups using the two software programs regarding the accuracy of the linear measurements (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the different formats among all the measurements, (p>0.05). The editing capabilities also showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: The generic 3D software (Meshmixer) was valid and accurate in cast measurements and linear and angular editing procedures. It can be used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning without added costs


Subject(s)
Software , Casts, Surgical , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Models, Dental
2.
Braz. dent. sci ; 24(4): 1-9, 2021. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1337584

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study attempted to investigate the effect of enamel deproteinization using citric acid, PEG 400 and NaOCL on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel using nano-silver modified resin for the prevention of white spot lesions. Material and Methods: 68 premolars were used in the study; nano-silver modified adhesive resin was used to bond orthodontic brackets to the enamel. Specimens were divided into 4 groups according to the applied surface treatment before bonding. Group I (control): acid etching with 37% phosphoric acid. Group II: deproteinization using 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) before acid etching. Group III:deproteinization using 10% citric acid before acid etching. Group IV:deproteinization using 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG 400) before acid etching. The specimens were then thermo- cycled for 6000 cycles. They were examined for surface roughness, shear bond strength and using electron microscope. Results: In both surface roughness and shear bond strength tests, Group III (citric acid) showed the highest values, followed by Group II (sodium hypochlorite); (p < 0.001). The least values were shown for Groups I (control) and IV (PEG 400), with no statistically significant difference between them (p = 0.948). SEM revealed etching pattern type 1 and 2 in the citric acid group while PEG 400 showed shallower micro- porosities. Conclusions: Deproteinization of enamel using either NaOCl or citric acid increased the bond strength of nano-sliver modified resin to enamel, with citric acid showing greater increase in bond strength. Deproteinization using PEG 400 did not increase the bond strength. (AU)


Objetivo: Este estudo buscou investigar o efeito da desproteinização do esmalte utilizando ácido cítrico, PEG 400 e NaOCl na resistência ao cisalhamento de braquetes ortodônticos ao esmalte usando resina modificada com nanoprata para a prevenção de lesões de manchas brancas. Material e Métodos: 68 pré-molares foram usados no estudo; resina adesiva modificada com nanoprata foi usada para colar os braquetes ortodônticos ao esmalte. Os corpos-de-prova foram divididos em 4 grupos de acordo com o tratamento de superfície aplicado antes da colagem. Grupo I (controle): condicionamento ácido com ácido fosfórico a 37%. Grupo II: desproteinização com hipoclorito de sódio a 5,25% (NaOCl) antes do condicionamento ácido. Grupo III: desproteinização com ácido cítrico a 10% antes do condicionamento ácido. Grupo IV: desproteinização com polietilenoglicol 5% (PEG 400) antes do condicionamento ácido. As amostras foram então termocicladas por 6.000 ciclos. Eles foram examinados quanto à rugosidade da superfície, resistência ao cisalhamento e usando microscópio eletrônico. Resultados: Nos testes de rugosidade superficial e resistência ao cisalhamento, o Grupo III (ácido cítrico) apresentou os maiores valores, seguido do Grupo II (hipoclorito de sódio); (p <0,001). Os menores valores foram apresentados para os Grupos I (controle) e IV (PEG 400), sem diferença estatisticamente significativa entre eles (p = 0,948). A microscopia eletrônica revelou padrão de ataque tipo 1 e 2 no grupo de ácido cítrico, enquanto PEG 400 mostrou microporosidades mais rasas. Conclusões: A desproteinização do esmalte com NaOCl ou ácido cítrico aumentou a força de união da resina modificada com nanoprata ao esmalte, com o ácido cítrico apresentando maior aumento na força de união. A desproteinização usando PEG 400 não aumentou a resistência de união. (AU)


Subject(s)
Sodium Hypochlorite , Citric Acid , Dental Cements , Dental Enamel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL